Are all measures of liver Kpuu a function of FH, as determined following oral dosing, or have we made a critical error in defining hepatic drug clearance?

Here we present, utilizing universally accepted relationships for hepatic clearance at steady state, that for all models of hepatic elimination the ratio of unbound liver drug concentration to unbound systemic blood concentration, Kpuu, is a function of or related to the hepatic bioavailability for that drug, FH. According to the derivation for the well-stirred model, Kpuu can never exceed unity, can frequently be a function of hepatic blood flow, and is equivalent to the value of FH as determined following oral dosing. For the parallel tube model, Kpuu will not equal FH but will be a function of FH and will also never be a value greater than 1. When hepatic clearance is rate limited by basolateral transporters, Kpuu will be less than 1, and less than FH. We believe that such outcomes are highly unlikely, and that the error arises from a basic assumption concerning hepatic clearance that leads to the mechanistic models of hepatic elimination, the well-stirred, parallel tube and dispersion models. That basic assumption is that the steady-state systemic concentration multiplied by the hepatic systemic clearance is equal to the product of the average unbound liver steady-state concentration and the intrinsic hepatic clearance (Css · CL = CH,u · CLint). Calculations of Kpuu and FH based on present methods of analysis provide a strong argument as to why this universally accepted relationship is not correct. Alternatively, we have shown in recent publications that hepatic clearance may be adequately determined based on Kirchhoff's Laws where no assumption of the above equality concerning hepatic intrinsic clearance is required, and where Kpuu is independent of hepatic extraction ratio and FH.

An examination of protein binding and protein-facilitated uptake relating to in vitro-in vivo extrapolation.

As explained by the free drug theory, the unbound fraction of drug has long been thought to drive the efficacy of a molecule. Thus, the fraction unbound term, or fu, appears in equations for fundamental pharmacokinetic parameters such as clearance, and is used when attempting in vitro to in vivo extrapolation (IVIVE). In recent years though, it has been noted that IVIVE does not always yield accurate predictions, and that some highly protein bound ligands have more efficient uptake than can be explained by their unbound fractions. This review explores the evolution of fu terms included when implementing IVIVE, the concept of protein-facilitated uptake, and the mechanisms that have been proposed to account for facilitated uptake.

The Universally Unrecognized Assumption in Predicting Drug Clearance and Organ Extraction Ratio.

For almost a half-century clearance concepts have been utilized in pharmacokinetics to understand the relationship between the dose administered and the time course of systemic concentrations to predict efficacy and safety, as well as how dosing should be modified in disease states. Various models of organ clearance/elimination have been proposed and tested. Surprisingly, however, the theoretical basis for the appropriate data collection to test these models has never been evaluated. Here we show that in vivo data collection limitations and the extraction ratio concept itself are only consistent with the well-stirred model of hepatic elimination. Evaluating measures of drug concentrations entering and leaving an organ will appear to best fit the well-stirred model, since driving force concentrations within the organ of elimination cannot be measured.

Between-Batch Pharmacokinetic Variability Inflates Type I Error Rate in Conventional Bioequivalence Trials: A Randomized Advair Diskus Clinical Trial.

We previously demonstrated pharmacokinetic differences among manufacturing batches of a US Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved dry powder inhalation product (Advair Diskus 100/50) large enough to establish between-batch bio-inequivalence. Here, we provide independent confirmation of pharmacokinetic bio-inequivalence among Advair Diskus 100/50 batches, and quantify residual and between-batch variance component magnitudes. These variance estimates are used to consider the type I error rate of the FDA's current two-way crossover design recommendation. When between-batch pharmacokinetic variability is substantial, the conventional two-way crossover design cannot accomplish the objectives of FDA's statistical bioequivalence test (i.e., cannot accurately estimate the test/reference ratio and associated confidence interval). The two-way crossover, which ignores between-batch pharmacokinetic variability, yields an artificially narrow confidence interval on the product comparison. The unavoidable consequence is type I error rate inflation, to ∼25%, when between-batch pharmacokinetic variability is nonzero. This risk of a false bioequivalence conclusion is substantially higher than asserted by regulators as acceptable consumer risk (5%).

Isoniazid hair concentrations in children with tuberculosis: a proof of concept study.

Assessing treatment adherence and quantifying exposure to anti-tuberculosis drugs among children is challenging. We undertook a 'proof of concept' study to assess the drug concentrations of isoniazid (INH) in hair as a therapeutic drug monitoring tool. Children aged <12 years initiated on a thrice-weekly treatment regimen including INH (10 mg/kg) for newly diagnosed tuberculosis were enrolled. INH concentrations in hair were measured using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry at 1, 2, 4 and 6 months after initiating anti-tuberculosis treatment. We found that INH hair concentrations in all children on thrice-weekly INH were detectable and displayed variability across a dynamic range.

Batch-to-batch pharmacokinetic variability confounds current bioequivalence regulations: A dry powder inhaler randomized clinical trial.

Current pharmacokinetic (PK) bioequivalence guidelines do not account for batch-to-batch variability in study design or analysis. Here we evaluate the magnitude of batch-to-batch PK variability for Advair Diskus 100/50. Single doses of fluticasone propionate and salmeterol combinations were administered by oral inhalation to healthy subjects in a randomized clinical crossover study comparing three different batches purchased from the market, with one batch replicated across two treatment periods. All pairwise comparisons between different batches failed the PK bioequivalence statistical test, demonstrating substantial PK differences between batches that were large enough to demonstrate bio-inequivalence in some cases. In contrast, between-replicate PK bioequivalence was demonstrated for the replicated batch. Between-batch variance was ∼40-70% of the estimated residual error. This large additional source of variability necessitates re-evaluation of bioequivalence assessment criteria to yield a result that is both generalizable and consistent with the principles of type I and type II error rate control.

A step closer to personalized chemotherapy: consideration of the influence of genetic variation in hepatic uptake transporters on the metabolism of CYP3A substrates.

Understanding the metabolic, transporter, and genetic influences on the disposition of drugs used in chemotherapy is critical to individualization of drug therapy. Recognition of the importance of transporter-enzyme interplay, in which genetic variants of drug uptake transporters can change drug metabolism when the enzymes are unchanged, is an important advance in predicting appropriate drug dosage regimens for the individual patient.

Drug absorption interactions between oral targeted anticancer agents and PPIs: is pH-dependent solubility the Achilles heel of targeted therapy?

A majority of the novel orally administered, molecularly targeted anticancer therapies are weak bases that exhibit pH-dependent solubility, and suppression of gastric acidity with acid-reducing agents could impair their absorption. In addition, a majority of cancer patients frequently take acid-reducing agents to alleviate symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux disease, thereby raising the potential for a common but underappreciated drug-drug interaction (DDI) that could decrease the exposure of anticancer medication and result in subsequent failure of therapy. This article is a review of the available clinical literature describing the extent of the interaction between 15 orally administered, small-molecule targeted anticancer therapies and acid-reducing agents. The currently available clinical data suggest that the magnitude of this DDI is largest for compounds whose in vitro solubility varies over the pH range 1-4. This range represents the normal physiological gastric acidity (pH ~1) and gastric acidity while on an acid-reducing agent (pH ~4).

Effect of single-dose rifampin on the pharmacokinetics of warfarin in healthy volunteers.

Based on in vitro rat and human hepatocyte uptake studies showing inhibition of warfarin uptake in the presence of the nonspecific organic anion-transporting polypeptide (OATP) inhibitor rifampin, a clinical study was conducted in 10 healthy volunteers to examine the in vivo relevance of OATP hepatic uptake on the pharmacokinetics of warfarin. In a randomized, single-dose, two-period, crossover design, subjects received a 7.5-mg dose of warfarin, either alone or immediately following a 600-mg intravenous dose of rifampin. Rifampin did not significantly alter the R- or S-warfarin area under the concentration-time curves (AUCs) from 0 to 12 h (period of hepatic OATP inhibition by rifampin) or the maximum plasma concentration (C(max)) value. AUC(0-∞) was decreased on days rifampin was administered, for both R-warfarin (25% reduction; P < 0.001) and S-warfarin (15% reduction; P < 0.05). No differences were seen in the area under the international normalized ratio (INR)-time curve. Our study suggests that hepatic uptake via OATPs may not be clinically important in the pharmacokinetics of warfarin.

The FDA should eliminate the ambiguities in the current BCS biowaiver guidance and make public the drugs for which BCS biowaivers have been granted.

Although US Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved Biopharmaceutics Classification System (BCS) class 1 drugs are designated as high-permeability drugs, in fact, the criterion utilized is high extent of absorption. This ambiguity should be eliminated, and the FDA criterion should explicitly be stated as > or =90% absorption based on absolute bioavailability or mass balance. Maintaining confidentiality regarding the drugs for which the FDA has approved BCS waivers of in vivo bioequivalence studies is not good public policy and should be reversed.

Hepatic clearance, but not gut availability, of erythromycin is altered in patients with end-stage renal disease.

Nonrenal clearance of drugs can be significantly lower in patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) than in those with normal renal function. Using erythromycin (ER) as a probe compound, we investigated whether this decrease in nonrenal clearance is due to reduced hepatic clearance (CL(H)) and/or gut metabolism. We also examined the potential effects of the uremic toxins 3-carboxy-4-methyl-5-propyl-2-furan propanoic acid (CMPF) and indoxyl sulfate (Indox) on ER disposition. Route-randomized, two-way crossover pharmacokinetic studies of ER were conducted in 12 ESRD patients and 12 healthy controls after oral (250 mg) and intravenous (125 mg) dosing with ER. In patients with ESRD, CL(H) decreased 31% relative to baseline values (0.35 +/- 0.14 l/h/kg vs. 0.51 +/- 0.13 l/h/kg, P = 0.01), with no change in steady-state volume of distribution. With oral dosing, the bioavailability of ER increased 36% in patients with ESRD, and this increase was not related to changes in gut availability. As expected, plasma levels of CMPF and Indox were significantly higher in the patients than in the healthy controls. However, no correlation was observed between CL(H) of ER and the levels of uremic toxins.

A Holy Grail of clinical pharmacology: prediction of drug pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics in the individual patient.

Predicting drug kinetics and dynamics in an individual patient is a worthy goal and has some chance of success for drugs subject to marked pharmacogenetic differences. However, one should not expect any prediction success for drugs primarily metabolized by the major cytochrome P450 enzyme, CYP3A4, whether one uses an exogenous drug or an endogenous metabolic process, such as the oxidation of cortisol.

Elucidating rifampin's inducing and inhibiting effects on glyburide pharmacokinetics and blood glucose in healthy volunteers: unmasking the differential effects of enzyme induction and transporter inhibition for a drug and its primary metabolite.

The effects of single doses of intravenous (IV) ciprofloxacin and rifampin and of multiple doses of rifampin on glyburide exposure and blood glucose levels were investigated in nine healthy volunteers. A single IV dose of rifampin significantly increased the area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) of glyburide and its metabolite. Blood glucose levels were significantly lower than those observed after dosing with glyburide alone. Multiple doses of rifampin induced an increase in liver enzyme levels, leading to a marked decrease in glyburide exposure and blood glucose levels. When IV rifampin was administered after multiple doses of rifampin, the inhibition of hepatic uptake transporters masked the induction effect; however, the relative changes in AUC for glyburide and its hydroxyl metabolite were similar to those seen under noninduced conditions. The studies reported here demonstrate how measurements of the levels of both the parent drug and its primary metabolite are useful in unmasking simultaneous drug-drug induction and inhibition effects and in characterizing enzymatic vs. transporter mechanisms.

HIV-infected liver and kidney transplant recipients: 1- and 3-year outcomes.

Improvements in human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-associated mortality make it difficult to deny transplantation based upon futility. Outcomes in the current management era are unknown. This is a prospective series of liver or kidney transplant recipients with stable HIV disease. Eleven liver and 18 kidney transplant recipients were followed for a median of 3.4 years (IQR [interquartile range] 2.9-4.9). One- and 3-year liver recipients' survival was 91% and 64%, respectively; kidney recipients' survival was 94%. One- and 3-year liver graft survival was 82% and 64%, respectively; kidney graft survival was 83%. Kidney patient and graft survival were similar to the general transplant population, while liver survival was similar to the older population, based on 1999-2004 transplants in the national database. CD4+ T-cell counts and HIV RNA levels were stable; and there were two opportunistic infections (OI). The 1- and 3-year cumulative incidence (95% confidence intervals [CI]) of rejection episodes for kidney recipients was 52% (28-75%) and 70% (48-92%), respectively. Two-thirds of hepatitis C virus (HCV)-infected patients, but no patient with hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection, recurred. Good transplant and HIV-related outcomes among kidney transplant recipients, and reasonable outcomes among liver recipients suggest that transplantation is an option for selected HIV-infected patients cared for at centers with adequate expertise.

Immunosuppressant pharmacokinetics and dosing modifications in HIV-1 infected liver and kidney transplant recipients.

Solid organ transplantation in human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected individuals requiring concomitant use of immunosuppressants (IS) (e.g. cyclosporine [CsA], sirolimus [SrL], tacrolimus [FK]) and antiretrovirals (ARVs) (e.g. protease inhibitors [PIs] and/or nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors [NNRTIs]) is complicated by significant drug interactions. To assist in appropriate clinical management, we describe the pharmacokinetics and dosing modifications in 35 patients (20 kidney, 13 liver and two kidney-liver HIV-infected subjects with end-stage kidney or liver disease), on both IS and NNRTIs, PIs, and combined NNRTIs + PIs, in studies done at weeks 2-4 and/or 12 weeks after transplantation or after a change in IS or ARV drug regimen (n = 97 studies). CsA, SrL and FK concentrations were measured in whole blood by LC/MS. HIV-infected transplant recipients using PIs with IS had marked increases in CsA, FK or SrL trough levels compared to those on NNRTIs alone or to patients not on ARVs, necessitating either a reduction in dose or an increase in dosing interval. Subjects on efavirenz (EFV) and CsA required much higher doses of CsA than those using any other ARV. Changes in antiretroviral therapy should be carefully managed to avoid insufficient immunosuppression or toxicity due to drug interactions.

Effects of uptake and efflux transporter inhibition on erythromycin breath test results.

The erythromycin breath test (EBT) is a standard test used to evaluate the extent of CYP3A4 activity. This study examines whether presumed changes in CYP3A4 activity are in fact related to inhibition of an uptake organic anion transporter using rifampin and inhibition of the efflux hepatic P-glycoprotein transporter using lansoprazole. Three EBT tests in healthy adults were conducted: EBT alone, with lansoprazole, and with rifampin. For all subjects, lansoprazole treatment increased respiratory (14)C excretion by +0.25+/-0.51 met/h (P=0.07) and rifampin decreased (14)C excretion by -0.44+/-0.40 met/h (P<0.001) compared with baseline. Comparing lansoprazole to rifampin, (14)C excretion increased by +0.69+/-0.50 met/h (P<0.001). Only women had significant changes after drug infusion: (14)C excretion after rifampin -0.40+/-0.36 met/h (P=0.018) and +0.47+/-0.44 met/h (P=0.018) after lansoprazole. Relying on EBT without considering transporter interactions can lead to errors in interpreting the degree of CYP3A4 metabolism.

Review and critique of the Institute of Medicine report "the future of drug safety".

In September 2006 an Institute of Medicine (IOM) ad hoc committee on the Assessment of the US Drug Safety System released its report entitled "The Future of Drug Safety: Promoting and Protecting the Health of the Public". The committee's report includes 25 recommendations that "will bring the strengths of the preapproval process (data, regulatory authority, organizational function and capabilities, and resources) to the postapproval phase in order to fulfill a lifecycle approach to the study, regulation, and communication about the risks and benefits of drugs." Copies of the report are available from the National Academies Press (800-624-6242), and the full text is available at http://www.nap.edu.

effect of OATP1B transporter inhibition on the pharmacokinetics of atorvastatin in healthy volunteers.

The inhibition of hepatic uptake transporters, such as OATP1B1, on the pharmacokinetics of atorvastatin is unknown. Here, we investigate the effect of a model hepatic transporter inhibitor, rifampin, on the kinetics of atorvastatin and its metabolites in humans. The inhibitory effect of a single rifampin dose on atorvastatin kinetics was studied in 11 healthy volunteers in a randomized, crossover study. Each subject received two 40-mg doses of atorvastatin, one on study day 1 and one on study day 8, separated by 1 week. One intravenous 30-min infusion of 600 mg rifampin was administered to each subject on either study day 1 or study day 8. Plasma concentrations of atorvastatin and metabolites were above the limits of quantitation for up to 24 h after dosing. Rifampin significantly increased the total area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) of atorvastatin acid by 6.8+/-2.4-fold and that of 2-hydroxy-atorvastatin acid and 4-hydroxy-atorvastatin acid by 6.8+/-2.5- and 3.9+/-2.4-fold, respectively. The AUC values of the lactone forms of atorvastatin, 2-hydroxy-atorvastatin and 4-hydroxy-atorvastatin, were also significantly increased, but to a lower extent. An intravenous dose of rifampin substantially increased the plasma concentrations of atorvastatin and its acid and lactone metabolites. The data confirm that OATP1B transporters represent the major hepatic uptake systems for atorvastatin and its active metabolites. Inhibition of hepatic uptake may have consequences for efficacy and toxicity of drugs like atorvastatin that are mainly eliminated by the hepatobiliary system.